Impacts of Stormwater and
Groundwater Ingress on Municipal Sanitation Services
Report No. 1386/1/05
March 2005
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
South Africa has experienced rapid growth in water service provision,
particularly in the last decades. In the past, standards have been
sacrificed and many older and poor quality sewers are showing signs of
leaking. Insufficient attention is paid to maintenance and
rehabilitation resulting in overloading of sewers and Waste Water
Treatment Works.
Sewer blockages and collapses take place due to penetration of roots,
structural movement, opening of joints, corrosion, sedimentation and
inadequate construction. Besides stoppages and collapses, stormwater
inflows and ongoing groundwater infiltration (or so-called extraneous
flows) can reduce the originally designated capacity of a sewer
collection system and negatively affect operation of the entire
waterborne sanitation system including the wastewater treatment
component (WWTP). Increases in extraneous flows reduce the
effectiveness of the biological process leading to higher pollution
loads leaving the WWTP and disposing partially treated urban wastewater
into adjacent river ecosystems.
Urban wastewater quantity and quality management issues and problems
are now equally important for either centralized or decentralized
disposal of urban wastewater return flows. Both quantity and quality of
such water is crucial to the well-bring of other water users located
downstream of the sources discharging wastewater and stormwater.
The urban water cycle is adversely affected by extraneous flows. If
there is exfiltration, there can be groundwater pollution which also
affects the catchment water balance. Water consumption is higher if
plumbing leaks and more water is cycled on a macro scale. This
increases the overall water supply cost as well as causing pollution.
The linkage of water flow between water supply input point and treated
effluent output point enables observation of the whole urban water
cycle. The evaluation of return flows and consumptive use is a critical
component in water resources development studies at various wastewater
catchment levels. Stormwater inflows and groundwater infiltration into
sewers have costly implications. Although in the past it has been the
practice to allow spare sewer capacity, this can increase sewer costs
by 10%-30%, and wastewater treatment by some 10%. The alternatives
available to mitigate extraneous flows are:
- Allow spare capacity in sewers and wastewater treatment
plant (WWTP).
- Lay pipes to high specifications to minimize
infiltration/exfiltration
- Refurbish existing deteriorated sewers
- Manage the feeder area to minimize extraneous flows
- Stormwater management (e.g. retention or detention holding
dams at WWTP)
A questionnaire distributed nationally produced alarming data. Little
attention is paid to inflows and infiltration and it is customary to
allow for up to 50% of sewer capacity and also to design WWTP to cope
with this flow. This project identified low awareness about I/I/E
problems and remedial/rehabilitation techniques by most South African
WSAs/WSPs. Due to the magnitude and complexities inherent to municipal
waterborne sewer systems, WSAs/ WSPs cannot make an educated decision
on developing a new or upgrading/rehabilitating existing systems
without a mixture of field and modelled data.
One of the major conclusions in this project is that most WSAs/WSPs in
South Africa resort to reactive maintenance, where problems are dealt
with on a corrective basis as they arise. Consequently, municipal
wastewater system maintenance budgets are commonly low and are based on
the previous year's financial expenditure on clogging and collapses.
Stoppages and clogging of sewers in South Africa per unit length of
sewer are about ten times higher than the international average. In the
meantime, the deterioration of municipal waterborne sewers continues to
the point of failure and beyond.
In order to gauge general awareness about inflow/infiltration (I/I)
problems in municipal sanitation systems in South Africa, a nation-wide
e-mail survey was conducted under this research project. The survey
generated new valuable information and verified several parameters for
the development/enhancement of urban separated sewer systems.
It was established that most municipal sewer systems in South Africa
have been in existence for 30 to 50 years and the aging process is
taking its toll so that issues related to rehabilitation or replacement
are becoming more important to the WSAa/WSPs. The type of materials
used in the construction of sewer systems have also changed from clay
and concrete to uPVC and AC piping, generating different problems.
The sample survey indicated that the most common causes of stormwater
inflows and groundwater infiltration in the South African context are
as follows:
- Inadequate design of certain system components,
- Illegal house down-pipe connections to the municipal sewers
(all surveyed municipalities operate separate instead of combined
sewers),
- Open gullies serve primarily as sullage disposal (this is
typically in most formal and informal townships),
- Unsealed manholes primarily due to theft of the manhole
covers,
- Faulty pipe joints due to improper construction or
deterioration,
- Roots penetrating joints
- Unwise man-made stormwater channelisation (e.g. road
crossings and culverts) and unattended overgrown vegetation in natural
channels, and
- High groundwater table.
Next to the common causes generated by this survey, other factors were
identified which can contribute locally to inflow/infiltration to
sewers:
- Undulating topography may lead to easy flooding
due to marginal changes in stormwater flows,
- Re-considered flood lines,
- Swimming pools can be a contributing factor if additional
stormwater or backwash water is linked directly to the sewers,
- Ground movement due to removed mine dumps destroying
continuity of sewers, and
- Thunderstorms of short duration and higher intensities in
various locations.
From the limited but representative sample of the nation-wide survey,
it is concluded that the typical average sewer blockage rate is 3,3
blockages/km sewer pipe/p.a. This figure is more than double the
average commonly quoted in the limited literature in South Africa of
1,2 blockages/km pipe/year and far supercedes international averages.
This aspect will influence the calculation of costs if trenchless
technology is adopted in sewer maintenance programmes. The most common
materials used by the municipalities are identified as uPVC and AC
piping, in pipe diameters ranging from 100 to 1000 mm. A surprising
aspect of municipal sewer systems is the large number of pumping
stations built in some of the existing systems which give rise to a
number of problems.
An area in the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (namely Boksburg
urban area) was assessed as a case study. Next to residential and
recreation grounds, it abuts an industrial area and sewers are built
through waterlogged ground. It was found that stormwater inflows
amounted to up to 40% of sewer capacity and groundwater infiltration
amounted to 15% of capacity. Leaking household and faulty plumbing
contributed a comparable amount. Field investigation methodologies and
inflow/infiltration monitoring results compiled by others in the urban
areas of Gauteng province and elsewhere in South Africa were evaluated
and relevant findings were combined into this report. Typical values of
key sewer flow components are as follows:
- Residential wastewater outflows range between 0,01 and 1,20
l/min/household
- Water leakages into municipal waterborne sewers range
between 0,06 and 0,20 l/min/household
- Groundwater infiltration into municipal sewers ranges
between 0,01 and 0,50 l/min/m-dia/m-pipe for all types of sewer
materials
From technical reports available on the subject of inflow/infiltration
in Boksburg and Benoni, the following were identified:
- Stormwater and surface inflows account for dramatic peak
flows (up to 3 times the AADWF) experienced, particularly in the
Boksburg Outfall. The source of the inflows can be attributed
predominantly to household stormwater being directed into the sewer
system through gulleys, and to a lesser extent, due to missing or
damaged manhole covers.
- Ground water infiltration produces a steady base flow in
the sewers, which increases treatment costs and reduces the operating
capacity in downstream sewers. It appears that only in severe cases
where the extent of groundwater infiltration may cause structural
collapse or substantial reduction in the capacity that pipe replacement
or repair makes financial and practical sense.
- Both stormwater inflow and groundwater infiltration are
continuing to increase due to reactive maintenance instead of planned
preventative maintenance and planned rehabilitation programmes.
The key conclusion this project identified was low awareness about I/I
problems and remedial/rehabilitation techniques by most South African
WSAs/WSPs. Due to the magnitude and complexities inherent to municipal
waterborne sewer systems, only a few WSAs/WSPs can make an educated
decision on developing a new or upgrading/rehabilitating an existing
system (or its key components). They lack mainly field and modeled
data, particularly on inflow/infiltration/ exfiltration events and
their consequences.
Guidelines concerning construction and rehabilitation of sewers were
prepared as part of the contract. Methods of evaluating the problem and
remedying the situation were listed. It is recommended to consider that
groundwater infiltration exceeding 0,10 l/min/m-dia/m-pipe is excessive
for all sewer pipe materials. Another major observation from this
project is that the maintenance strategy of most WSA/WSPs in South
Africa is essentially reactive maintenance, where problems are dealt
with on a corrective basis as they arise. Consequently, municipal
wastewater system maintenance budgets are commonly low and are based on
the previous year's financial expenditure mainly from clogging and
collapsing sewers. It has been established from a survey that stoppages
and clogging of sewers in South Africa per are about ten times higher
than the international average, averaging to 3,3 blockages/km/sewer
pipe/per annum.
It was also established by this project that the costs associated with
maintaining or expanding existing and/or developing new urban
wastewater infrastructure appear to be large, but well invested if
allocated on a regular basis. Because there is not yet enough pressure
applied from the wastewater services end-users to municipal managers
about the economics of alternative solutions, conventional methods
prevail and benefits are not highlighted in the cost analysis. Water
infiltration in sewer pipelines is common and should be included in the
peak design flow. A norm of 15% of the dry weather flow allowance for
extraneous flows is a generally acceptable standard. Flows exceeding
this norm will result in pipe capacity problems and an unnecessary
increase in sewer discharge volumes and treatment costs. A reduction in
infiltration/inflow rates will not only save on sewerage treatment
costs, but may defer capital expenditure for the upsizing of collection
sewer pipelines and wastewater treatment plant. The decision to solve
or ignore an infiltration problem should therefore be based on a
benefit-cost analysis.
Due to the magnitude and complexity of the attention required to
research, design, construction and management of wastewater sanitation
systems, all relevant stakeholders must share responsibility for
development and management of these systems. The application of new
local and international technologies must be promoted by the WSAs and
WSPs through adopting the Guidelines in capacity building programmes.
To sustain a reliable municipal wastewater infrastructure and required
service to customers, new and improved solutions to existing and
emerging problems will have to be researched. Spheres for further
research relate to flow monitoring, assessment of structural integrity,
operation and maintenance programmes, and new methods in rehabilitation
of sewers.